The individuals who comprise the United Nations, like those who comprise the Barack Hussein Obama Regime, have thirsted for the elimination of America's 2nd Amendment rights since long before Obama began sleeping in the White House.

But this is the closest any of them have come to realizing their dream of a disarmed American public, unable to defend themselves.

Not because there are fewer guns and less ammo available, but because they're about to begin the process, which will happen incrementally.

Remember how gun & ammo sales went through the roof when Obama won the election in November, 2008? Remember the empty ammo shelves at most stores that sold it? Especially the handgun rounds; I remember when it was VERY difficult to find ammo.

Those days may be a fond dream, in the one-to-two-year time frame.

According to Larry Bell, the coming global 'Small Arms Treaty' will do the following:

1. Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.
2. Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).
3. Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).
4. Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.
5. In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

I have noticed that as soon as the Obama Regime moved into the White House, that there have been several high-profile shootings, by Islamist Terrorists and Leftists alike. I'm not saying they're part of a greater conspiracy to overthrow our freedoms, but whether they're part of a plan, or they're just being used by the media & the Obama Regime, it doesn't matter. The effect on our freedoms will be the same, if we fail to stop this UNCONSTITUTIONAL TREATY!

Anyway, despite the rash of shootings, or should I say, media 'flood the zone' technique highlighting shooting stories, the American public has NOT been convinced to go along with more draconian legislative restrictions on our 2nd Amendment rights.

But that certainly won't stop the forces of evil from attempting to take away our means of self-defense. And I think it's more likely that we'll need those means of self-defense. We've won many battles, but we've lost some very important ones. We failed to re-take the U.S. Senate in November, as stunning, and as momentous as our re-taking the House was. It was a HUGE victory, but we didn't take the U.S. Senate, adn that hurt us.

We have failed to elect representatives & senators who are willing to impeach/convict Obama, and so we must wait for an election to remove this constitution-defacing tyrant, despite his clear violation of the Constitution with respect to the War Powers Act. I pray that a peaceful transition, including an election and swearing-in of OUR GUY/GIRL into office in January, 2013, will still happen. It's less certain now, but it can still happen. It could be worse. Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats could still have the House of Representatives. Thankfully, we took care of her, but we still have FAR to go before this is settled. And next year will determine, IMHO, whether we'll be able to get this done peacefully.

And the radical left is preparing to take it to the street, and things will become even less stable. Remember what Glenn Beck said about those types on his TV show back during the summer of 2010:

Tea parties believe in small government. We believe in returning to the principles of our Founding Fathers. We respect them. We revere them. Shoot me in the head before I stop talking about the Founders. Shoot me in the head if you try to change our government.

I will stand against you and so will millions of others. We believe in something. You in the media and most in Washington don't. The radicals that you and Washington have co-opted and brought in wearing sheep's clothing — change the pose. You will get the ends.

You've been using them? They believe in communism. They believe and have called for a revolution. You're going to have to shoot them in the head. But warning, they may shoot you.

They are dangerous because they believe. Karl Marx is their George Washington. You will never change their mind. And if they feel you have lied to them — they're revolutionaries. Nancy Pelosi, those are the people you should be worried about.

Here is my advice when you're dealing with people who believe in something that strongly — you take them seriously. You listen to their words and you believe that they will follow up with what they say.

And the radical leftists, the leftist union leaders, they have said that they want REVOLUTION, and they want it NOW!

Here's what Glenn Beck said about some of these people:

--------


STORM Handbook

Friday, Jun 11, 2010 at 8:32 AM EDT

The radicals have infected the Democratic party. Just today, Van Jones was speaking at the America’s Future Now conference for progressives, energized because “this week will mark a historic inflection point when progressives decided to be progressives again in this country."

Jones used to be affiliated with a group called STORM. That stands for Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement. A group whose members included anarchists and communists. This is why I’ve said that the president is in danger – he’s got revolutionaries all around him who believe in these tactics.

Download the STORM handbook (PDF File)


--------


Here's the video clip from that episode of Glenn Beck's TV show on FNC:



PLEASE PREPARE YOURSELF AND YOUR FAMILY, FELLOW PRINCIPLED PATRIOTS!

Food, Water, Clothing, Toiletries, Fuel, Cash/Gold/Silver, Guns, Ammunition, etc. Make sure you're ready, America.

Don't forget to AGAIN state your position to your U.S. Representatives, to BOTH of your U.S. Senators, your GOVERNOR, and your County Sheriff!

Here's the Op-Ed from Forbes that got me going:

--------

U.N. Agreement Should Have All Gun Owners Up In Arms

Jun. 7 2011 - 2:04 pm | 619,812 views

It may not come as surprising news to many of you that the United Nations doesn’t approve of our Second Amendment. Not one bit. And they very much hope to do something about it with help from some powerful American friends. Under the guise of a proposed global “Small Arms Treaty” premised to fight “terrorism”, “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates” you can be quite certain that an even more insidious threat is being targeted – our Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms.

What, exactly, does the intended agreement entail?

While the terms have yet to be made public, if passed by the U.N. and ratified by our Senate, it will almost certainly force the U.S. to:

Enact tougher licensing requirements, creating additional bureaucratic red tape for legal firearms ownership.

Confiscate and destroy all “unauthorized” civilian firearms (exempting those owned by our government of course).

Ban the trade, sale and private ownership of all semi-automatic weapons (any that have magazines even though they still operate in the same one trigger pull – one single “bang” manner as revolvers, a simple fact the ant-gun media never seem to grasp).

Create an international gun registry, clearly setting the stage for full-scale gun confiscation.

In short, overriding our national sovereignty, and in the process, providing license for the federal government to assert preemptive powers over state regulatory powers guaranteed by the Tenth Amendment in addition to our Second Amendment rights.

Have no doubt that this plan is very real, with strong Obama administration support. In January 2010 the U.S. joined 152 other countries in endorsing a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will establish a 2012 conference to draft a blueprint for enactment. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has pledged to push for Senate ratification.

Former U.N. ambassador John Bolton has cautioned gun owners to take this initiative seriously, stating that the U.N. “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

Although professing to support the Second Amendment during her presidential election bid, Hillary Clinton is not generally known as a gun rights enthusiast. She has been a long-time activist for federal firearms licensing and registration, and a vigorous opponent of state Right-to-Carry laws. As a New York senator she ranked among the National Rifle Association’s worst “F”-rated gun banners who voted to support the sort of gunpoint disarmament that marked New Orleans’ rogue police actions against law-abiding gun owners in the anarchistic aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

President Obama’s record on citizen gun rights doesn’t reflect much advocacy either. Consider for example his appointment of anti-gun rights former Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels as an alternate U.S. representative to the U.N., and his choice of Andrew Traver who has worked to terminate civilian ownership of so-called “assault rifles” (another prejudicially meaningless gun term) to head the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.

Then, in a move unprecedented in American history, the Obama administration quietly banned the re-importation and sale of 850,000 collectable antique U.S.-manufactured M1 Garand and Carbine rifles that were left in South Korea following the Korean War. Developed in the 1930s, the venerable M1 Garand carried the U.S. through World War II, seeing action in every major battle.

As an Illinois state senator, Barack Obama was an aggressive advocate for expanding gun control laws, and even voted against legislation giving gun owners an affirmative defense when they use firearms to defend themselves and their families against home invaders and burglars. He also served on a 10-member board of directors of the radically activist anti-gun Joyce Foundation in Chicago during a period between 1998-2001when it contributed $18,326,183 in grants to anti-Second Amendment organizations.

If someone breaks into your home when you are there, which would you prefer to have close at hand: 1) a telephone to call 911, or 2) a loaded gun of respectable caliber? That’s a pretty easy question for me to answer. I am a long-time NRA member, concealed firearms license holder and a regular weekly recreational pistol shooter. And while I don’t ordinarily care to target anything that has a mother, will reluctantly make an exception should an urgent provocation arise. I also happen to enjoy the company of friends who hunt, as well as those, like myself, who share an abiding interest in American history and the firearms that influenced it.

There are many like me, and fewer of them would be alive today were it not for exercise of their gun rights. In fact law-abiding citizens in America used guns in self-defense 2.5 million times during 1993 (about 6,850 times per day), and actually shot and killed 2 1/2 times as many criminals as police did (1,527 to 606). Those civilian self-defense shootings resulted in less than 1/5th as many incidents as police where an innocent person was mistakenly identified as a criminal (2% versus 11%).

Just how effectively have gun bans worked to make citizens safer in other countries? Take the number of home break-ins while residents are present as an indication. In Canada and Britain, both with tough gun-control laws, nearly half of all burglaries occur when residents are present. But in the U.S. where many households are armed, only about 13% happen when someone is home.

Recognizing clear statistical benefit evidence, 41 states now allow competent, law-abiding adults to carry permitted or permit-exempt concealed handguns. As a result, crime rates in those states have typically fallen at least 10% in the year following enactment.

So the majority in our Senate is smart enough to realize that the U.N.’s gun-grab agenda is unconstitutional, politically suicidal for those who support it, and down-right idiotic—right? Let’s hope so, but not entirely count on it. While a few loyal Obama Democrats are truly “pro-gun”, many are loathe to vote against treaties that carry the president’s international prestige, causing him embarrassment.

Also, don’t forget that Senate confirmation of anti-gun Obama nominee Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. Many within the few who voted against her did so only because of massive grassroots pressure from constituents who take their Constitutional protections very seriously.

Now, more than ever, it’s imperative to stick by our guns in demanding that all Constitutional rights be preserved. If not, we will surely lose both.

--------


IS THE U.N. TRYING TO STRIP AMERICANS’ SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS?

Posted on June 7, 2011 at 9:05pm by Billy Hallowell

Is the United Nations gunning for Americans’ second Amendment rights?

In an op-ed for Forbes, University of Houston professor Larry Bell rails against the U.N.’s “Small Arms Treaty.” Bell claims that the international body is passing the measure off as an effort intended to combat terrorists and insurgents. He says the measure has a very different purpose:

Under the guise of a proposed global “Small Arms Treaty”…you can be quite certain that an even more insidious threat is being targeted – our Constitutional right for law-abiding citizens to own and bear arms.

Bell claims that this international treaty, from the Obama administration’s perspective, is an opportunity to increase domestic gun control. If implemented, he believes it will enforce rougher licensing requirements, more red tape, create an “international gun registry,“ ”confiscate and destroy all ‘unauthorized’ civilian firearms’” and severely impede Americans’ right to bear arms.

Bell explains that this plan is very real and that the U.S. has already joined 152 other countries in to endorse a U.N. Arms Treaty Resolution that will lead to a 2012 conference. It is during this meeting that plans to enact these international new controls will take place. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has said she will encourage the Senate to ratify he resolution as well...

--------

WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS?