2nd Amendment ... how short is it's time? Ms. obozo's warning to gunowners...

Nearly three years into President Obama’s first term in office, Michelle Obama finally said something with which I can agree.

At a recent fundraiser for President Obama’s re-election campaign in Providence, Rhode Island, the first lady told her audience:

“We stand at a fundamental crossroads for our country. You’re here because you know that in just 13 months, we’re going to make a choice that will impact our lives for
decades to come … let’s not forget what it meant when my husband appointed those
two brilliant Supreme Court justices … let’s not forget the impact that their decisions will have on our lives for decades to come.”

This was music to the ears of the small, affluent crowd of admirers who cheered and applauded. But to gun owners, Michelle Obama’s remarks should sound like a warning bell, alerting us to the danger ahead should Barack Obama win re-election and get the
opportunity to alter the current make-up of the Supreme Court.

When Americans flock to the polls in 13 months, we will not simply decide which direction our country should take over the next four years. Rather, we will decide whether or not our fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms will survive over the next several decades.

Currently, the Second Amendment clings to a 5-4 pro-freedom majority on the Supreme Court. Just one vote is all that stands between the America our Founding Fathers established and a radically different America that Barack Obama and his supporters
envision.

If you want to read something scary, take another look at the minority opinions in the Supreme Court’s landmark Heller and McDonald decisions that struck down Washington, D.C.’s and Chicago’s unconstitutional gun bans. In the Heller dissent, four justices concluded that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to own a firearm, nor does it protect our right to defend ourselves, our families, or our property. In McDonald, the same four justices argued that the 5-4 Heller decision should be reversed.

If these
four justices had just one more vote on their side, their opinion — that the Second Amendment should not exist in today’s modern society — would be the law of the land today. And assuredly, the anti-gun activist wing of the court knows how close they are to gaining the upper hand. As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg told a Harvard Club audience in 2009, she looks forward to the day when a “future, wiser court” overturns 5-4 decisions like Heller.

Praying for the health of five justices is not a sound legal strategy for ensuring that our
Second Amendment freedoms survive the relentless legal assault that gun-ban groups are waging in courtrooms across America. We need a president who will nominate sound, originalist nominees to the high court — nominees who will preserve the freedoms our Founding Fathers enshrined in our Constitution.

If President Obama gets the opportunity to tilt the balance of the Supreme Court in his favor, we’re unlikely to see another pro-gun victory at the Court in our lifetime. Even worse, the 5-4 majorities in Heller and McDonald will be in serious jeopardy of being reversed, effectively eliminating the Second Amendment.

NRA members, gun owners and all freedom-loving Americans should heed Michelle Obama’s warning. We must spend the next 13 months working to make sure her husband doesn’t get four more years to destroy American freedom for generations to come.

Chris W. Cox is the Executive Director of the National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) and serves as the organization’s chief lobbyist.
Source: http://dailycaller.com/2011/10/11/mi...to-gun-owners/

Tags: 2nd_Amendment, SCOTUS, anti-gun, gun, michelle_obozo, rights

Views: 79

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

The only way an activist court can overturn Constitutional Law is if We the People allow it by refusing to exercise our rights to liberty and freedom to their fullest extent. If we prove then as a nation to be that lazy then we do not deserve the honor and priveledge of Liberty that those before us died for.
Dittos Gary!!  We can only lose our rights if we refuse to exercise them!!  This may require some pain just like exercise does when you use muscles that haven't been used for a while
Oh yes... there will be pain! We ain't gettin' no younger!
The supreme court does not have the power under the Constitution to make laws or rewrite the Constitution.  Therefore, any such action taken by them is null and void.  There is no right given to them to INTERPRET the Constitution either.  Their job is only to compare laws to the Constitution and rule on whether or not they are Constitutional.  For example, they should look at the case of one Barry Soetoro, an Indonesian citizen, and decide based on the Constitution that he in fact is not a natural born citizen and is therefore not eligible to be president.  They should also look at every gun control law there is and declare all of them unconstitutional based on the phrase in the 2A "shall not be infringed" because every single one of them is some kind of infringement on the right to keep and bear arms.  Therefore, every one of these laws are in fact null and void regardless of what the supreme court says about them.  This is a right which has been "endowed by our Creator" NOT a priveledge granted by the gooberment.  Therefore no branch of the gooberment can take this right away or even "infringe" upon it a little bit.  It is simply not within their power to do so.

"Therefore no branch of the gooberment can take this right away or even "infringe" upon it a little bit.  It is simply not within their power to do so."

 

It is if we do not stand against them, and that is what they are counting on!

It follows then that any law that makes it even a tiny bit more hard or restrictive for Americans today to have and bear arms than it was for OUR forefathers is an unconstitutional and unjust law And NOT a law at all. Provided that congress made the law which infringes, because they shall not.
It is the laws made by local and state governments that deem themselves to have that authority that WE THE PEOPLE reserve only for ourselves that create the mess we are in. In my opinion of course because I can't speak for all of your state and local governments.  YOU must.

RSS

NEW MEMBER?

This is the link to our

NEW MEMBERS GROUP

Click to go there so that we may help you


Join WRAM on facebook

DONATIONS & PATCHES

 



To this WEBSITE, WRAM

To order Patches or Donate by mail, send Money Order or Cashiers Check made out to:
Robin Starkey for WRAM
PO BOX 982
ROCKSPRINGS,TX 78880

We are currently out of patches. Please wait till we are restocked to order. Thank you

***********************

 

 

 

 

 

WRAM MILITIA AND PATRIOTIC T-SHIRTS


________________________

HIGH QUALITY AMMUNITION. 50 cal. and smaller at great prices.
Here is how you can contact me:

ROSEHILL CUSTOM SHOP
TOMBALL, TEXAS
George Collins
713-899-0788

Forum

Armed March Update 31 Replies

 Here's the latest about Adam Kokesh' armed march on Washington DC, designed to demonstrate that we will not give up our guns. I listened to that interview and he makes a lot of sense. The guy fought in Fallujah so he obviously is no coward. And…Continue

Started by Jaro in MILITIA, RELATED DISCUSSIONS ONLY. Last reply by Gary Yantz 13 minutes ago.

The Time to Impeach the Impostor is NOW! 15 Replies

People, I'm sure you remember that - just this past week - we handed Obama his ass on the push for more "gun control" legislation.I want you to think about that for a second here.In spite of all the pressure the Obama Administration brought to bear…Continue

Started by Steven Peter Yevchak, Sr. in OPEN DISCUSSIONS- MUST Use the link Below. Last reply by PaulM 5 hours ago.

Armed March on Washington DC in July? 171 Replies

Adam Kokesh is promoting an armed march on Washington DC to demonstrate that we will not give up our guns. I just don't know about that, itseems very risky and could backfire. All you need is one agent provocateur who fires a shot and it could go…Continue

Started by Jaro in MILITIA, RELATED DISCUSSIONS ONLY. Last reply by David E Steelman OKDF 10 hours ago.

54 Colorado Sheriffs File Suit Against Anti-Gun Bills 3 Replies

The Independence Institute held a press conference on May 17, 2013 announcing the lawsuit against the new anti-gun bills passed by the Colorado legislature and signed by Governor John Hickenlooper. The lead attorney is Dave Kopel.Continue

Started by Slow Poke in OPEN DISCUSSIONS- MUST Use the link Below. Last reply by Slow Poke 11 hours ago.

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

Badge

Loading…

© 2013   Created by Minuteman.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service