WRAM - We dedicate our hearts,minds and bodies to protecting our great Republic!
What happens to sovereigns when Judges don't know the Law?
Testimony of Linda's Daughter (also Sovereign).
Linda Louise, 66 years old, was exercising her rights to liberty, travel, assembly, conscious and worship when she was stopped by an agent of a private municipal, for profit corporation and was accosted, assaulted, battered (dropped on the road after dragging her out of her private automobile with U.S.D.O.T. number prominently displayed), captured and held hostage for ransom under force of arms and color of authority and color of law on May 1, 2012.
She has been held in a solitary cell since then, denied visitors and phone calls for 30 days (which expires June 11, 2012 at 3:11 AM), restricted to 1-2 showers per week, 1-2 hours of “outside” time (under glass) in a courtyard area per week, disallowed access to chaplain or religious assembly, disallowed legitimate legal mail from her daughter / limited power of attorney / lawful counsel until after arraignment 5/24/12 and Habeas Corpus hearing 6/6/12. Some of her legal mail has been opened without her being present, some returned as “attempted - not known - return to sender.” Postcards are allowed up to 5 x 7 size (which takes an envelope's stamp, 4.25” is maximum for a postcard stamp). All mail must have full name and address of the recipient and sender (or you can use mine!), and homemade postcards are acceptable:
FROM: Nicole Corin (or your name)
21347 Coulton Avenue
Port Charlotte, FL 33952
TO: Linda Louise
Charlotte County Jail
26601 Airport Road
Punta Gorda, FL 33982
Her next scheduled hearing (and possibly trial) is June 15, 2012. Several documents are filed and pending. That's all I know at this time. Prayer support very appreciated!
Sovereign part II interdiction:
SIDENOTE: THE CHARLOTTE SUN HAD AN ARTICLE ABOUT THE ARREST THE FIRST PART OF MAY. ON 6/4/12 CHRIS PORTER, THE CHARLOTTE SUN EDITOR, WAS GIVEN THE CCSO ARREST DETAILS, ASKED IF HE REALIZED THE WOMAN WAS STILL IN JAIL, ASKED TO CHECK IT OUT AND WRITE A FOLLOW UP ARTICLE, AND IF HE WOULD LIKE THE PHONE NUMBER OF THE DAUGHTER. HE SAID HE WOULD CHECK IT OUT AND WOULD NEED TO INTERVIEW THE DAUGHTER FOR THE ARTICLE. DAUGHTER'S PHONE NUMBER WAS LEFT ON HIS VOICEMAIL AROUND 2:30 PM THAT SAME DAY. AS OF 6/11/12 WE ARE STILL WAITING FOR HIM TO CONTACT THE DAUGHTER SO HE CAN DO THE INTERVIEW FOR THE FOLLOW UP ARTICLE.
Testimony of the friend she was visiting.
Here is some of the story from the friend she was visiting.
Linda and her daughter and another lady who traveled with the mom from Vermont were going to a friends house in Punta
Gorda,Florida. Four houses from the friends house she was pulled over by the Punta Gorda Police. She had a tag (sign) which said DOT exempt. They asked her why she had no license plate, she said she has a sign with the exempt number on it. They asked her for her drivers license, she said she was not driving, she was actually "traveling", driving was for professionals. They asked about something else and she handed them a paper she carries with the supreme court decision that said it was ok. The girls with her had walked to the friends house to get someone to drive the car to their house, and when he and they came to the scene, the police had grabbed her and pulled her out of the car and put her face down on the ground and handcuffed her. They were ordering her to get up, and she was having trouble doing it. The friend said he asked what was the matter, and the police ordered him to stand back or he would be arrested.
Punta Gorda Police decided that the car had to be towed and my friends wife appealed to the tow truck driver to leave the car, but he was too scared to do that for fear of loosing his job.
The Police hauled Linda off and the rest ensued as the previous note informs. This is my home area, and it really concerns me that law is getting so forceful. Her friend and mine said the judge whenever she finally got to see him, made her wait all day, she did not eat all day, theJudge said "we are innocent until proven guilty here" someone came in at that time and informed the judge that she was not being allowed either habeas corpus or bail.
The way I understand it to not be put under the system she had to refuse food for three days, and not allow fingerprint and mug shots. One night about 2:30 two police came into her cell, pulled her out of bed and onto the floor, hog tied her front and back and drug her by the ropes to be fingerprinted and mug shot. No bible or visitors were allowed for 3 weeks and then only by remote video. She is well versed in the law, but "video her visitors" were not allowed pencil and paper to take notes so she could not effectively counsel them on how to help her.
A professional sovereignty group in Texas prepared a Habeas for her, and it was turned down by Punta Gorda, stating some technicality. Another attempt at Habeas was made and also turned down. She was sent an 11 page legal and only two pages made it to her. I think she now has another legal form and is making out one for another try. I believe she is close to being out of solitary, I don't think she will take a regular lawyer because of her legal standing.
Please encourage others to send her postcards as stated in the full letter. My wife went to the media and made and appeal to cover the story.
Sovereign given solitary confinement, Part III
SIX more weeks in Solitary confinement.
Post From her friend, today June 15, 2012
So Lynn got a 5 min jail video hearing.
Keep in mind this was ongoing from the 5/24 hearing.
Now they have scheduled a trial for July 29th SIX MORE WEEKS IN SOLITARY CONFINEMENT for NO CRIME committed.
This corrupt kleptocracy makes me sick.
Several of my friends and I plus some at the local tea party donated the fee to send our sheriff, Sheriff Cameron, to the constitutional sheriffs project in Las Vegas. He has since basically rejected the training as "radical", guess the constitution and our founders who signed their life on the declaration were too radical also. At this point I will not have any substantive time to spend on this project until next week. PLEASE WRITE A POSTCARD AS SPECIFIED ABOVE TO LINDA AND ENCOURAGE HER.
I will accept any good counsel (except the A.C.L.U.). I don't know what has happened to the judge in this case, as I studied the constitution with him for several years, and for now I will reserve any comments relevant to our friendship. I am depending on Gods Sovereign Grace to guide, direct, and change the heart of the judge.
For further study on this subject, you can go to www.constitutionalsheriffs.ning.com website and look up Michael Badnarik's constitution class, especially video's 5 and 6. Uncommon and unconstitutional law is being substituted illegally into our law system, the Constitution is the "Law of the Land". Amendment VII calls for "common law" and jury. It is time to demand release of this prisoner of an increasingly visible police state and tyrannical system. Only a legally knowledgeable (more than our judges and lawyers), informed and vocal people can solve this problem. We who know that a bully must be stopped in the day you hear of it, understand that if good men do not stand now, it only gets worse later.
Yes, Germany 1939 all over again! It will not be long till this stuff is happening to us, the fact that she was sovoriegn gave them an EXCUSE. Before long NO "excuses" will be needed!
Well I want have no excuses for putting a country ass whipping on any police who violates my rights. I have lost all respect for any police and goverment.
My heart and prayers go out to anyone facing these problems and illegal incarceration.
Our Brother Charles Dyer is currently serving 30 years for a crime he did not commit.
Calling the Sovereign movement "nutz" is like saying Freedom is insane. It is legal, and what our founding fathers believed in and used in drafting the Constitution. You just have to be a law professor to do it in court and as in this case you meet with resistance from the "Corporation" and you may well pay for it.
Linda, Charles, and how many more?? We can only hope and pray that soon, the time will come and we can welcome them all back home again, as all truly FREE SOVEREIGN CITIZENS.
Viva la Revolution!!
2 hours East of Dallas/Fort Worth DFW just south of I-30.
I know that they will be filing the appeal, but no word on status or how he is doing.
The lawful and legal issue is one which courts cannot and will not address. The courts jurisdiction lies within the statutory boundaries and not within the constitutional boundaries.
There is no court in this country which will discuss and address common law issues or sovereignty disposition as they do not have to based on them being statutorily bound with regard to jurisprudence.
Our constitution was truthfully suspended in 1933, and since the only mentioning of the Constitution such as the current obamacare issue are only done to give the impression of constitutional recognition but in fact is actually completely disregarded.
Within the Code of Federal Regulations you can find the fact that "There does exist two United States, one is the seat of government and the other is the Corporation of the United States solely owned by the seat of government," as a result of this fact we are surrounded with what is known as "color of law" which when examined under constitutional scrutiny are in fact no law as they violate the provisions set forth under the constitution.
Again, the difference being the enforcement of corporate statute (Policies of the Corporation of the United States) or observation of the limits of government will (right we have given the seat of government to exercise with our interest in focus) one is called lawful and the other is called legal.
Bottom line, we the people have zero access to a constitutional court (lawful common law) and therefore it is by statutory (legal corporate policy) we find ourselves trying to defend ourselves within should one be found in a court in this country.
Here is one of the largest differences;
In a lawful court one must have to present on actual loss of property, a breach of contract, in other words a victim seeking restitution for such loss or breach.
In a statutory court there need not be a victim or a loss presented and is usually represented by the plaintiff being the State.
I hope this sheds some light for you, and trust me I too have attempted to have my local court recognize lawful status rather than legal status, and the only thing which has been done here is that we did get the court to remove the flag of Admiralty from the court room and replace it with a Sovereign flag but they will not review cases with common law or lawful arguments period, actually if you were to raise them you would probably find yourself in the same predicament as the writers family of this threads beginning.
The problem actually lies within the population setting up corporate charters which we call municipalities, townships and so on and not making it a mandate that we do not give up our rights as sovereign citizens and have allowed shrewd business men and women to devise a corporation which can enforce its policies upon those under its geographical parameters. We call these codes, State Code, Municipal Code, there is a big difference in code enforcement (used to generate revenue) and plaintiff vs defendant litigation (used to settle disputes).
The writer of this discussion's beginning is correct in stating that the person was "traveling" verses "driving" as one is a commercial term and the other is a civil right, again bottom line the statutory enforcement agents of the state or municipality are only interested in using color of law to create revenue streams for their authorizing corporations, here is the most demeaning thing of the matter, " it is you and I which financially support them in doing so, what a cadundrum.
De Oprresso Liber!